Employer's Legal Handbook:

Intro

Wrongful Discharge Cases

Guidelines for Firing Employees

The Firing Process


Print PDF Version                         (must have Adobe Acrobat)


Click here for full product information


Termination


(top of page)
Firing an employee has always been an uncomfortable task, but it used to be clearcut—and relatively free of legal complications. You simply
paid the former employee for accrued wages plus any earned but unused vacation time to which the employee was entitled.

 

Things are more complicated now. Firing someone—even a person who is demonstrably incompetent—can be a risky endeavor. Do it for the wrong reason or in the wrong way and you can be obligated to pay substantial money in damages, or to rehire the worker.

 

In firing employees, you must beware of potential legal sticking points. For example, a former employee who believes that he or she was fired in retaliation for reporting a workplace hazard to OSHA may have legal grounds for filing a claim against you. And, in some situations, an employee who asserts that your employee handbook amounted to a contractual guarantee of job security may be found to have a valid claim.

 

As a result of these and other exceptions to the at-will employment principle, lawsuits by former employees against their former employers have increased. And despite the fact that many employees have been fired for valid reasons, some of them have won cases based on illegal firing simply because the employer was sloppy in terminating the employment relationship.

For a more in-depth discussion of how to fire employees without running afoul of the law or harming your business, see Firing Without Fear, by Barbara Kate Repa (Nolo).

 

Copyright © 1999-2001 Nolo.com All Rights Reserved

 

 

(top of page)

A.         Wrongful Discharge Cases

Cases in which former employees claim that they were terminated for an improper reason or that an employer bungled the process are known as wrongful discharge cases—and they’re based on a number of legal theories. You can better avoid being sued for wrongful discharge if you grasp these theories.

Because state laws and court decisions vary in this area, not all of the legal theories for wrongful discharge will be available to all former employees. Also, since the law can change—and many recent changes favor workers, not employers—you need to keep up to date on the specific rules in your state.

Many state trade associations publish newsletters or magazines to help keep their members informed of changes in employment law. Your state chamber of commerce may also have helpful publications on this subject.

 

1.     Statutes

If you discriminate illegally in firing an employee, a statute may give him or her the right to base a wrongful discharge case against you on that ground. Other statutes prohibit firing an employee for specified reasons, unrelated to discrimination. The main statutes that employees rely upon in asserting wrongful discharge claims are described here.

a.  Race, color, religion and national origin discrimination

Under federal law—and many state statutes as well—it’s illegal to discriminate against workers based on race, color, religion or national origin. These same statutes make it illegal to retaliate against a worker who complains about discrimination or who otherwise asserts his or her rights under the statute.

b.  Age, gender and pregnancy discrimination

Additional federal and state statutes bar discrimination based on age, gender and pregnancy. These same statutes make it illegal to retaliate against a worker who complains about discrimination or who otherwise asserts his or her rights under the statute. And discrimination based on sexual orientation is also prohibited in a growing number of states, cities and counties.

c.  Sexual harassment

Sexual harassment is a form of illegal discrimination covered primarily by statutes prohibiting sex discrimination.

d.  Disability discrimination

The Americans With Disabilities Act bars discrimination against people with physical or mental disabilities. It also bars retaliation against people who complain about discrimination or who otherwise assert their rights under the statute.

e.  Refusal to submit to lie detector test

A federal law, the Employee Polygraph Protection Act, makes it illegal to fire an employee for refusing to take a lie detector test. Many state laws also set out strong prohibitions against using lie detector tests in employment decisions.

f.  Alien status

The Immigration Reform and Control Act requires you to verify that an employee is eligible to work in the United States. But you can’t use alien status as a reason to fire a worker who is legally eligible to work here.

g.  Complaining about safety or health conditions

Under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, you can’t fire (or otherwise retaliate against) someone for complaining that working conditions fall short of complying with state or federal safety and health rules.

 

2.     Court Decisions

 

Wrongful discharge lawsuits are not always based on statutes. Many courts have awarded wrongful discharge damages to former employers for nonstatutory or common law reasons. The main ones are discussed here.

a.  Breach of contract

Employers sometimes make promises to job applicants to entice them to become employees. And some employers may also dangle inducements in front of current employees to discourage them from leaving. A number of judges have ruled that if a person relies on such promises, an enforceable contract of employment has been created. An employer may be held liable for wrongful discharge if the employee is fired in violation of that contract.

 

Example: Betty, a diligent worker at AutoTec, is offered a job by a rival employer. She declines the job after AutoTec’s president tells her she’ll have a job for life at AutoTec if she continues to effectively manage her workload. Three years later, AutoTec fires Betty even though she has kept up with her work. Betty sues for wrongful discharge, claiming AutoTec violated its employment contract with her by firing her.

 

Specific promises of job security—either written or oral—are not always necessary for a judge to rule that an employee can’t be fired arbitrarily. Some judges have allowed fired employees to collect damages or be reinstated to jobs because the employer created a legitimate expectation that employees wouldn’t be fired without good cause. The typical focus in these cases is on inferences of job security made by the employer in a written document such as an employee handbook. It, too, may be enforced as a contract.

 

Example: After six months on the job, Tom is fired from his job at Syspro, a small software house. He sues for wrongful discharge, claiming that Syspro’s employee handbook led him to believe that he’d only be fired for good cause—and that, in fact, Syspro fired him without a good reason. The judge agrees that it was reasonable for Tom to conclude, after reading the employee handbook, that his job was secure. The court rules that the employer’s wording of the handbook constituted an implied contract.

b.  Breach of good faith and fair dealing

A few wrongful discharge cases have been based on the premise that every employment relationship includes an automatic commitment by the employer to deal fairly and in good faith with the employee. Applying this doctrine, judges have held that a discharge was wrongful when an employer has dealt arbitrarily with an employee. Almost all of these cases have involved longtime employees who were fired as they neared retirement age.

 

Example: Rita has worked for Jones Enterprises for nearly 25 years. The company fires her just three months before her retirement benefits are to become permanent. In a wrongful discharge case against Jones, the judge finds that the company fired Rita to save itself the expense of paying her the full benefit of her retirement program. The judge rules in Rita’s favor because the firing breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

c.  Violation of public policy

Judges sometimes rule that a firing was wrongful because it was against the best interests of the public. Most courts do not allow an employer to fire an employee, for instance, because he or she was trying to correct a potentially harmful business practice.

 

Example: Clinical Lab Center, a small company that processes blood tests for doctors, fires Joe, a medical technician, because he has twice complained to management that the inadequate testing of blood samples by other technicians has led to many inaccurate test results. A judge rules that Joe’s firing was wrongful because it violated public policy. Workers, the judge notes, should be free to speak up about sloppy practices they find on the job—especially those affecting public health or safety.

 

Courts have held that it’s against public policy to fire a worker for refusing to file phony reports with a state environmental agency, bribe public officials, commit perjury or engage in industrial espionage. Courts have also held that it is against public policy to fire an employee for refusing to commit an illegal act or for threatening to report an employer’s illegal conduct.

 

Copyright © 1999-2001 Nolo.com All Rights Reserved

 

(top of page)

B.         Guidelines for Firing Employees

Even though your motives in firing someone are completely honorable and legitimate, the action may remain legally risky business. But there are several steps you can take to greatly reduce the chances of a former employee suing your business and being awarded a judgment against you.

 

1.     Contractual Commitments

Before you fire an employee, check into whether you’ve made an oral or written contractual commitment that may limit your right to fire. Consider the following:

   Is there a written or oral contract or document (including a hiring letter) that promises the employee a job for a fixed period of time?

   When you hired the employee, did you make any oral commitments about job security?

   Have you assured the employee that you’d only fire him or her for good cause?

   Have you listed causes for termination—in a contract, employee handbook or elsewhere—in a way that limits you to those specified causes?

   Does your employee handbook or other written policy or memo make any promises about job security?

   Does your company have written or customary procedures that must precede firing?

 

Your answers to these questions will help you identify whether you’ve limited your ability to fire the individual. Even if you are positive that you have never given the employee any assurances of job security—either oral or written—you should still proceed with caution, especially when dealing with an employee who has been with your business for a number of years. Some courts have held that a long employment relationship can imply assurances of job security, which in turn can imply an employment contract that limits your ability to fire the employee. If an employee has only been working for you for a few months—or even for a year—you probably don’t have to worry about this issue. If the employee has been with your business for, say, 15 years, however, you should be careful. If you don’t have a really good reason for firing the employee, consider consulting an attorney before taking action.

 

Employment contracts can be a two-way street. While they may limit your right to fire an employee, the flipside is that they usually spell out the employee’s obligations to your business. If the employee isn’t performing well, chances are that he or she is in breach of the contract, giving you the legal right to terminate the relationship. Because the interpretation of contract terms can involve legal subtleties, consider having a brief conference with a lawyer before firing an employee who has a written contract.

Say What You Mean And Mean What You Say:

The words you use in hiring someone and in writing an employee handbook can create a contractual commitment that you didn’t anticipate. Your employee handbook and similar documents should reserve your right to terminate employees at your discretion. While you may also wish to list some specific types of conduct that will result in termination, such as dishonesty or excessive absenteeism, those shouldn’t be stated in a way that implies they are the only ways to end the relationship. Also, your handbook and other communications with employees should not make any promises about long-term job security. If they do, it’s time for a rewrite.

2.     Lawful Reasons for Firing

To head off the possibility that an employee may try to base a wrongful termination action on alleged illegal conduct or motives in your workplace, be prepared to show the real reason for the firing.

 

Reasons that may support a firing include:

   performing poorly on the job

   refusing to follow instructions

   abusing sick leave

   being absent excessively

   being tardy habitually

   possessing a weapon at work

   violating company rules

   being dishonest

   endangering health and safety

   engaging in criminal activity

   using alcohol or drugs at work

   behaving violently at work

   gambling at work, and

   disclosing company trade secrets to outsiders.

 

Depending on the nature of your business, you may have other legitimate reasons to fire employees as well. Whatever reasons you use as a basis for firing people, it’s absolutely essential that you treat your employees evenhandedly. That is, if you regularly let some employees engage in prohibited conduct, you’ll be on shaky legal ground if you claim good cause for firing others for the same reason.

 

Example: Andrew, a black patient attendant, is a half-hour late for work three days in a row. His employer, a medical clinic, fires him. In suing for wrongful discharge based on illegal discrimination, Andrew shows that two white attendants had been similarly tardy in recent weeks, but received only a verbal warning to shape up. Even though excessive tardiness is a valid business reason for firing someone, the jury awards damages to Andrew because the employer applied the rules unevenly and unfairly.

Getting Help Before Firing a Violent Employee

Almost always, if an employee behaves violently or makes threats in the workplace, that will constitute a valid reason to fire him or her. After all, you need to protect other employees as well as customers and others likely to come into contact with the violent person. Yet, judges in a few cases have suggested that a violent or threatening employee may be entitled to some latitude or accommodation if the violent behavior stems from a mental or emotional disorder.

On balance, it’s generally best to proceed decisively and fire the violent employee—as humanely as possible, of course. You may, however, want to confer in advance with an experienced employment lawyer to reduce the likelihood of later legal entanglements.

 

Copyright © 1999-2001 Nolo.com All Rights Reserved

 

(top of page)

C.         The Firing Process

Where possible, give employees ongoing feedback about job performance, conduct formal job evaluations once or twice a year and impose progressive discipline. Ideally, a firing shouldn’t come suddenly or as a surprise.

 

When you’ve reached the point where firing an employee is the best or only option, you must mind some legal strictures as you carry out the firing.

Speedy Action is Sometimes Appropriate

There can be situations in which moving quickly to fire someone—without a warning—may be the best course. For example, if your delivery truck driver is convicted of drunk driving, it makes sense to get rid of the driver. Similarly, you shouldn’t feel it necessary to give advance warning to a bookkeeper who has embezzled money from your company. In general, use your judgment and err on the side of giving an employee a chance to correct a problem. But in extreme circumstances, don’t hesitate to act quickly.

 

1.     Severance Packages

Many employers and employees wrongly believe that every fired employee is legally entitled to severance pay. The truth is that you must only give severance pay when it’s required by a contract with the employee. Still, in some cases, you may wish to offer severance pay and other benefits to help cushion the impact of a firing—and alleviate ill will.

 

If you’re inclined to offer a severance package, it makes sense to be more generous with longtime employees than with those who have been with you just a year or two. For a short-term employee—someone who’s worked for you for two years, for example—you might offer one month’s pay plus payment of health insurance premiums for 90 days. For an employee who’s been on your payroll for 15 years, it would be reasonable to offer six months of salary plus one year’s worth of paid health insurance premiums.

 

You can be creative in putting together a severance package. The benefits you may wish to consider include:

   severance pay

   continuation of employee benefits, such as payment of health insurance premiums for a limited time

   a favorable letter of reference if your normal policy is to give only a former employee’s position and term of employment

   releasing the employee from special obligations such as a covenant not to compete

   allowing the employee to keep any advance of expense funds or commissions that otherwise would be repayable to your business

   allowing the employee to keep the desk, chair, computer, cellular phone or tools that he or she has been using

   agreeing not to contest the employee’s right to unemployment compensation

   paying for outplacement services, and

   promising to pay an employee’s moving expenses, up to a stated limit.

 

Also, consider paying the employee for unused vacation time that the employee would otherwise lose. Normally, the conditions under which an employee will be compensated for unused vacation time are a matter of policy to be set by an employer—but you can bend that policy to benefit a departing employee.

 

Example: Alpine Ski Shop pays its employees for two weeks of vacation time each year, but states in its employee’s handbook: “You must take your vacation during June, July or August and while you are on Alpine’s payroll. Vacation time not used during that period will be forfeited unless you secure prior approval.” Employee Kurt takes one week of his vacation in July and doesn’t ask for permission to take the second week later. In October, Alpine fires Kurt because of an attitude problem. As part of a severance package, Alpine pays Kurt for the unused week of vacation time.

Paying for Vacation Time May Be Mandatory

In some states, the law doesn’t allow an employer to set a policy forcing employees to forfeit unused vacation or sick time once it has accrued. In such states, the accrued vacation or sick time is treated as wages and must be included in an employee’s final paycheck. The key legal issue is whether the vacation time has accrued. Check with the state department of labor to learn how much latitude you have regarding payment for vacation and sick time.

 

2.     Preparing the Paperwork

Before you fire an employee, prepare a letter describing the severance package you intend to offer. And if you want the employee to waive possible legal claims against your business to qualify for the severance benefits, consider preparing a severance agreement as well.

 

For a release to be enforceable, you must offer the employee something of value in exchange for giving up his or her possible claims against your business. The severance package in the sample agreement satisfies this legal requirement.

 

Also, give the employee a reasonable time—three or four business days, for example—to decide whether to accept your severance package and sign the severance agreement containing a release of claims. A coerced release is legally worthless.

 

Special rules apply if the employee is releasing claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. If you present a release to an individual employee who’s 40 years old or older, you must give the employee a fixed period of time in which to decide on signing the waiver. That period must be at least 21 days if the waiver has been presented to the employee alone. If you’ve presented the waiver to a group or class of employees, you must give each worker at least 45 days to decide whether or not to sign. In either case, a worker has seven days after agreeing to such a waiver to revoke his or her decision.

 

3.     Return of Property

In planning for the termination meeting, make a list of all company property that has been given to the employee. Be prepared to get back these items from the employee either at the meeting or within a reasonable time afterward. Items to think about include:

   automobiles

   computers, cellular phones and beepers

   confidential manuals and other documents

   keys, credit cards, uniforms, ID badges, and

   parking permits.

 

Don’t overlook any expense account funds you advanced to the employee. You may be entitled to deduct such advances from the employee’s final paycheck.

 

4.     The Termination Meeting

Call the employee into a private office or meeting room and inform him or her of your decision. Be honest and direct in stating your reasons for ending the employment. If you’ve given the employee ongoing feedback, the firing shouldn’t come as a complete shock. Make it clear that this is a final decision and that you’re not going to change your mind. Unless the employee is likely to be a menace in the workplace, allow a day or so—but no longer—to clear out his or her desk and say goodbye to co-workers.

The Right to Have a Co-Worker Present

All employees have the right to have a co-worker present with them at investigatory interviews or meetings that the employee believes will result in disciplinary action from their employer. Disciplinary action could include termination.

This right is called a Weingarten right after a U.S. Supreme Court decision. (To read that decision—NLRB v. J. Weingarten, 420 U.S. 251 (1975)—go to Nolo’s Legal Research Center at http://www.nolo.com.) That decision only gave the right to employees who were members of a union. In 2000, however, that right was expanded to nonunion employees as well.

Although no court has held that employers have an affirmative duty to inform employees of this right, it’s prudent to do so—and to allow the employee to have a witness by his or her side.

 

Common Sense Can Help Avert Violence:

You may have zeroed in on scary newspaper headlines about disgruntled former employees who open fire on former employers. The actual incidence of such violence is quite low. Still, it pays to be prudent.

Violence following a firing is most apt to occur in a workplace where there are high levels of stress, autocratic and unpredictable managers, poor communication and employees who feel powerless.

 Be especially careful if you’re firing an employee for performing poorly—a charge that may be emotionally loaded. Some workers who are fired without warning can go over the edge because they feel there was nothing they could do to control the situation. In giving feedback before a firing, let workers know if their performances are below par—and focus on the specific ways in which job performance falls short of the mark. Warn workers that they may lose their jobs if they don’t improve.

At a termination meeting with a potentially volatile employee, confine your discussion to the specific behavior about which the employee was warned. Never attack the worker personally. Remind the worker that he or she was given fair warning and an ample opportunity to change work habits.

Let the fired employee know that you won’t be discussing the reasons for the firing with his or her former co-workers and that you’re prepared to give a neutral letter of recommendation to prospective employers who inquire. This will help preserve the employee’s self-esteem, making violence unlikely.

   Troubled employees often exhibit behavioral clues that you shouldn’t ignore: high absenteeism, known substance abuse, chronic tardiness, and harassing and threatening others. If you’re about to fire someone who appears to have a potential for violence, consider consulting first with a psychologist who specializes in workplace issues.

 

Copyright © 1999-2001 Nolo.com All Rights Reserved

 

Excerpted from the “The Employer’s Legal Handbook”, by Fred S. Steingold