// Copyright (c) 2011, the Dart project authors. Please see the AUTHORS file // for details. All rights reserved. Use of this source code is governed by a // BSD-style license that can be found in the LICENSE file. part of "dart:core"; /// The signature of a generic comparison function. /// /// A comparison function represents an ordering on a type of objects. /// A total ordering on a type means that for two values, either they /// are equal or one is greater than the other (and the latter must then be /// smaller than the former). /// /// A [Comparator] function represents such a total ordering by returning /// /// * a negative integer if [a] is smaller than [b], /// * zero if [a] is equal to [b], and /// * a positive integer if [a] is greater than [b]. typedef Comparator = int Function(T a, T b); /// Interface used by types that have an intrinsic ordering. /// /// The [compareTo] operation defines a total ordering of objects, /// which can be used for ordering and sorting. /// /// The [Comparable] interface should be used for the natural ordering of a type. /// If a type can be ordered in more than one way, /// and none of them is the obvious natural ordering, /// then it might be better not to use the [Comparable] interface, /// and to provide separate [Comparator]s instead. /// /// It is recommended that the order of a [Comparable] agrees /// with its operator [operator ==] equality (`a.compareTo(b) == 0` iff `a == b`), /// but this is not a requirement. /// For example, [double] and [DateTime] have `compareTo` methods /// that do not agree with operator [operator ==]. /// For doubles the [compareTo] method is more precise than the equality, /// and for [DateTime] it is less precise. /// /// Examples: /// ```dart /// (0.0).compareTo(-0.0); // => 1 /// 0.0 == -0.0; // => true /// var now = DateTime.now(); /// var utcNow = now.toUtc(); /// now == utcNow; // => false /// now.compareTo(utcNow); // => 0 /// ``` /// The [Comparable] interface does not imply the existence /// of the comparison operators `<`, `<=`, `>` and `>=`. /// These should only be defined /// if the ordering is a less-than/greater-than ordering, /// that is, an ordering where you would naturally /// use the words "less than" about the order of two elements. /// /// If the equality operator and [compareTo] disagree, /// the comparison operators should follow the equality operator, /// and will likely also disagree with [compareTo]. /// Otherwise they should match the [compareTo] method, /// so that `a < b` iff `a.compareTo(b) < 0`. /// /// The [double] class defines comparison operators /// that are compatible with equality. /// The operators differ from [double.compareTo] on -0.0 and NaN. /// /// The [DateTime] class has no comparison operators, instead it has the more /// precisely named [DateTime.isBefore] and [DateTime.isAfter], which both /// agree with [DateTime.compareTo]. abstract interface class Comparable { /// Compares this object to another object. /// /// Returns a value like a [Comparator] when comparing `this` to [other]. /// That is, it returns a negative integer if `this` is ordered before [other], /// a positive integer if `this` is ordered after [other], /// and zero if `this` and [other] are ordered together. /// /// The [other] argument must be a value that is comparable to this object. int compareTo(T other); /// A [Comparator] that compares one comparable to another. /// /// It returns the result of `a.compareTo(b)`. /// The call may fail at run-time /// if `a` is not comparable to the type of `b`. /// /// This utility function is used as the default comparator /// for ordering collections, for example in the [List] sort function. static int compare(Comparable a, Comparable b) => a.compareTo(b); }