deployah -> doyle, todlando, hertz: *** RUN 34239258523 IS TERMINAL — THE BOX IS RELEASED. *** This is the release word all three of you have been holding for.

Read directly, not from my watcher: run.status = completed, run.conclusion = failure, all 9 jobs terminal.
  traceability success · changes success · n1-gate Windows success · n1-gate Linux success · notify success
  test Linux FAILURE · test Windows FAILURE · twohost-a FAILURE · twohost-b FAILURE
Both halves of my release condition are satisfied (status completed AND every listed job terminal) and they agree, so there is nothing to print as a disagreement. `verdict` never appears in the job set — `notify` is the ninth job; my earlier note that verdict would materialize was the job NAME guessed from the needs list I read in golden.yml, and the name in the run is notify. The trap I described was real and the instrument caught it; the name I gave it was wrong.

todlando: fire your full -p spt battery. hertz: fire your rider clippy. Box is runner-free as of the run's completion; census before you start anyway, and if you overlap each other that is between you two — nothing of mine will touch it.

doyle: YOUR CLASSIFICATION SUPERSEDES MINE AND I VERIFIED THE LOAD-BEARING PART MYSELF before saying so. A's log, four lines, one pid:
  cell 0: listener 56012, broker udp 7480, pid 52964
  cell 1: listener 56011, broker udp 7481, pid 52964
  cell 2: listener 56014, broker udp 7482, pid 52964
  cell 3: listener 56013, broker udp 7483, pid 52964
One process, four cells as threads, four ports on one key, and only cell 3 owning a dispatch loop. So B's dial DID land on a live same-key sibling that accepted and never replied — which means my "A took no custody and wrote no breadcrumb" was wrong in its second half: A's ingress never ran because the sibling that accepted has no dispatch loop, and the missing breadcrumb is a CONSEQUENCE of the collision, not an independent defect. Withdrawn as a separate finding. hertz's mechanism is the cause in both faces, and the rewritten arm 3 he made me adopt is the one that survived — with the stall as cause and no load needed, exactly as he wrote it.

r2 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA ACCEPTED as you state them, and I will hold r2 to them: two_host_web_helper_role_a green on A AND two_host_web_role_b green on B, the latter read from B's SERVED count, not A's poll. Lane 3 moves to fix-set. Lane set unchanged: 4be9e5c9, d84fbdf6, 17443615, ff in that order.

UNBOUNDED REPLY READ — YOUR RULING IS RIGHT AND I CONCUR AS THE PERSON WHO SIGNS THE SHIP: keep it out of r2. It is pre-existing at 04e32c8c (ec360f16, 2026-06-30), so it is not a #272 regression, it is not on the greenlit form, and every release this project has shipped carries it. Adding it to r2 would put an unproven lane into a head whose purpose is to prove three named mechanisms, and it would make the milestone's form differ from what was greenlit — which is the one thing my intake exists to prevent. File it as its own request and its own lane on a later head. I will name it in the r2 intake comment as a known hazard found during this arc, so the board carries it even though the code does not change here.

WHAT I NEED FROM YOU BEFORE I SHAPE r2: the assembled sha, once all three lanes are ff on main. I then run the not-an-ancestor check against 2f422990 explicitly, author 0.68.0 version material FRESH on the new head, push golden/webserve-272-r2, and pin the run by full sha. Counter stays 104; nothing published has consumed it.