warning: in the working copy of 'crates/spt-daemon/src/access.rs', LF will be replaced by CRLF the next time Git touches it
diff --git a/crates/spt-daemon/src/access.rs b/crates/spt-daemon/src/access.rs
index cfe4e531..ef1f0e08 100644
--- a/crates/spt-daemon/src/access.rs
+++ b/crates/spt-daemon/src/access.rs
@@ -275,11 +275,11 @@ impl DiscoverGate {
 
 #[cfg(test)]
 mod tests {
-    use spt_store::access::REPLY_WINDOW_MS;
-    use spt_store::perch::node_key_file;
     use super::*;
     use crate::test_home::with_home;
+    use spt_store::access::REPLY_WINDOW_MS;
     use spt_store::access::{AccessRule, Mode, OriginQualifier, Provenance, RuleDecision, Subject};
+    use spt_store::perch::node_key_file;
 
     // [unit->REQ-TRUST-WARNING] the whole warning table, over EVERY pass reason
     // in both classification states. Two properties are pinned at once: an
@@ -558,7 +558,10 @@ mod tests {
             s.save().unwrap();
 
             let gate = DiscoverGate::load();
-            assert!(gate.discloses("ling", "aa11"), "the DISCOVER subject sees it");
+            assert!(
+                gate.discloses("ling", "aa11"),
+                "the DISCOVER subject sees it"
+            );
             assert!(
                 gate.discloses("doyle", "bb22"),
                 "the refusal is scoped to the ruled endpoint"
@@ -776,7 +779,9 @@ mod tests {
         with_home(|_| {
             let mut s = AccessStore::default();
             s.endpoint_mut("ling").rules.push(AccessRule {
-                subject: Subject::Node { node: "aa11".into() },
+                subject: Subject::Node {
+                    node: "aa11".into(),
+                },
                 surfaces: Vec::new(),
                 origin: OriginQualifier::User,
                 provenance: Provenance::Manual,
@@ -875,11 +880,7 @@ mod tests {
             "a reply to the engine room's own outbound reaches it"
         );
         assert_eq!(
-            classify_engine_room_inbound(
-                Posture::Online,
-                surface::MSG,
-                InboundClass::Unsolicited,
-            ),
+            classify_engine_room_inbound(Posture::Online, surface::MSG, InboundClass::Unsolicited,),
             InboundLock::Unsolicited,
             "and nothing else does"
         );
@@ -973,7 +974,14 @@ mod tests {
             // The wrapper and the stamped path agree — neither is the loose one.
             assert_eq!(
                 access_check(er, &me, surface::MSG, InboundClass::Unsolicited),
-                access_check_with_sender(er, &me, surface::MSG, InboundClass::Unsolicited, None, None),
+                access_check_with_sender(
+                    er,
+                    &me,
+                    surface::MSG,
+                    InboundClass::Unsolicited,
+                    None,
+                    None
+                ),
                 "the wrapper must not be a second, weaker gate"
             );
             // And an ordinary endpoint still passes through the stamped path.
@@ -1223,7 +1231,10 @@ mod tests {
             spt_store::info::set_controlled(&spt_store::engineroom::engine_room_perch(), false)
                 .expect("detach");
             let gate = DiscoverGate::load();
-            assert!(!gate.discloses(er, "bb22"), "de-advertisement rides the posture drop");
+            assert!(
+                !gate.discloses(er, "bb22"),
+                "de-advertisement rides the posture drop"
+            );
             assert!(!gate.discloses(er, &me));
             assert!(
                 gate.discloses("ling", "bb22"),